Au contraire, the watermark is clear evidence of an attempt to protect the images.jimi wrote:They are proof copies, clearly watermarked so there shouldn't be any problems with posting them.
Re-posting them here is a clear breach of copyright. Fact. Should he discover them and seek a remedy it will become an issue.
Even more interesting is this detailed critique.jimi wrote:Interesting reading http://photothisandthat.co.uk/2013/04/2 ... ographers/
http://www.epuk.org/News/1032/erra-you- ... make-it-up