Rev. 1 Suspension Geometry

This section is for technical Q & A
Please try the search function before starting a new thread.
Forum rules
Many subjects will have been discussed before. Please try the search function before starting a new thread.
Check in the Know Your 2 as the information you need may already be there.
Important ! - Please make your topic title as descriptive as possible . titles with just "help" generally dont get as many answers as a title that points to the problem
The forum Administrator has chosen to advise you that this topic is 8 years and 11 months old and that you may wish to begin a new topic or use the search feature to find a similar but newer topic.
User avatar

Topic author
Lindy1

Rev. 1 Suspension Geometry

Post by Lindy1 »

I may be posting this in the wrong place and am happy to take guidance if that's the case, but I'm after some information regarding the Mk. 2 Rev. 1 specifics. I've got a 1990 Rev. 1 Coupe (seemingly the only one in the country without a boot spoiler!) - chassis number in the 23000s - and my other half and I are slowly restoring her to as near original condition as we can. From our research, the Rev. 1 had 'issues' with the handling if you got carried away and, for the Rev. 2, the suspension geometry was changed and 15" wheels were added, as well as revised torsion bars and strengthened anti-roll bars. Ours has already got 15" wheels and we are wondering if she might have also had a suspension upgrade, but don't know how to find out. Is there anyone out there who could explain how we can check if our baby is a genuine Rev. 1 or if she's had any little tweaks or upgrades?

Any and all assistance gratefully received.

Lindy1 (Somerset)

P.S. Thoroughly enjoyed seeing all your toys at Japfest...shame we had to leave ours in the car park :annoyed:


User avatar

d-peg
Posts: 6729
Joined: 13/02/07 22:02
Years of MR2 Ownership: 13
MR2's Owned: 6
Real Name: Dan
Gender: Male
Location: Sandwich, Kent
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Rev. 1 Suspension Geometry

Post by d-peg »

Hello Lindy,

Believe me, there are plenty out there without the rear spoiler.This was the base model with the 3S-FE engine and ~120hp.

It's a fairly straight-forward difference and I would not worry too much about handling. Some of the rev1 stories are tantamount scaremongering! Basically on rev2+ they made the handling more predictable at the limit. As for visual differences you can see with the suspensions (easily) you need to be under the car.

The rear subframe differences...
Image
(rev1 top, rev2+ bottom)

Image
You can see from the picture the rear track control arms are much longer on the rev2+

Front suspension differences...
(struggling with a decent image here...)
Image
If you look at this as a general rev2+ layout - assuming that the strut rod would be a one piece affair with a rubber bush on the end. Importantly where the trailing arm connects to the strut rod is bolted. On a rev1 this is adjustable (which a lot of people prefer)... Much the same way as the rear suspension components bolt together.

Like the below tech drawing
Image

I'm hoping someone can find better pics than I! :D

Hope this helps.
92 JDM Turbo - V8 Project Car - LINK
93 UK N/A - V6 SC Project Car - LINK
00 mk3 2zz - Driven Daily :D - LINK
It's not a party till I get my bum out
User avatar

Topic author
Lindy1

Re: Rev. 1 Suspension Geometry

Post by Lindy1 »

Thanks, Dan - that's great! I'm thinking we may need to have her up on the ramps one evening this week and see what she's got. It might be my IT, but the rear subframe shot hasn't come through. I'm guessing that if the front end matches the picture and has an adjustable strut on the lower arm, then the rear should match - fingers crossed. And thanks for the rapid response - much appreciated.

Lindy1
User avatar

d-peg
Posts: 6729
Joined: 13/02/07 22:02
Years of MR2 Ownership: 13
MR2's Owned: 6
Real Name: Dan
Gender: Male
Location: Sandwich, Kent
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Rev. 1 Suspension Geometry

Post by d-peg »

Didn't work on mine either! Fixed now :th:

:)
92 JDM Turbo - V8 Project Car - LINK
93 UK N/A - V6 SC Project Car - LINK
00 mk3 2zz - Driven Daily :D - LINK
It's not a party till I get my bum out
User avatar

stuMR2lee
Posts: 2935
Joined: 18/01/10 11:58
Years of MR2 Ownership: 7
MR2's Owned: 6
Real Name: Stu
Gender: Male
Location: Colchester, Essex

Rev. 1 Suspension Geometry

Post by stuMR2lee »

Edit: irrelevant now!
Last edited by stuMR2lee on 19/05/15 15:58, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar

Topic author
Lindy1

Re: Rev. 1 Suspension Geometry

Post by Lindy1 »

Brilliant! I can see them all now - many thanks, Dan. And the differences seem pretty obvious. If I get any more problems, I'll let you know, but hopefully that'll help us to work it out.

Really appreciate your help,

Lindy1
User avatar

MR2DI4
Posts: 1474
Joined: 20/04/11 23:18
Current Model: None
Years of MR2 Ownership: 23
MR2's Owned: 1
Real Name: 2023 i30N Hatch 6MT
Gender: Male
Location: Tauranga >>> New Zealand
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Rev. 1 Suspension Geometry

Post by MR2DI4 »

Great informative post Dan.

Wouldn't panic about the Rev 1 suspension, just fit really good tyres to the 15" rims (getting harder to find) and you will be fine on 120Hp. Basically mine on 15" rims and twice the horsepower is still fine, its about knowing the limits of the car and these are pretty hard to find on the road with a good set-up, you do however discover them at a track if you drive it exceptionally hard.
User avatar

Howlin_Mad
Posts: 6816
Joined: 14/09/06 1:00
Years of MR2 Ownership: 10
MR2's Owned: 3
Real Name: Yes I have one ta.
Gender: Male
Location: Wolverhampton

Re: Rev. 1 Suspension Geometry

Post by Howlin_Mad »

MR2DI4 wrote:Wouldn't panic about the Rev 1 suspension, just fit really good tyres to the 15" rims (getting harder to find) and you will be fine on 120Hp. Basically mine on 15" rims and twice the horsepower is still fine, its about knowing the limits of the car and these are pretty hard to find on the road with a good set-up, you do however discover them at a track if you drive it exceptionally hard.
Try a Rev 3 turbo on 1.15bar boost on high gain on a Rev 1 rear subframe ;)

HM
MGB GT For Sale// JDM Rev3 3VZ-FE V6
User avatar

MR2DI4
Posts: 1474
Joined: 20/04/11 23:18
Current Model: None
Years of MR2 Ownership: 23
MR2's Owned: 1
Real Name: 2023 i30N Hatch 6MT
Gender: Male
Location: Tauranga >>> New Zealand
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Rev. 1 Suspension Geometry

Post by MR2DI4 »

Even with 300Hp plus I would only look at changing the wheels to enable lower profile tyres to be used to improve the grip. Stock 15" rims with Toyo RE888's are no problem with only 245Hp.
User avatar

_Al_
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 2761
Joined: 21/07/05 1:00
Current Model: MK2
Years of MR2 Ownership: 15
MR2's Owned: 7
Real Name: Mr Misfire
Gender: Male
Location: I'm either working on the car or the house
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Rev. 1 Suspension Geometry

Post by _Al_ »

Only thing I can think to add is the top mounts on the rev 1 were the "offset" type. Can't remember the exact terminology.

To check those open the frunk and take a look at where the tops of the dampers come through the bulkhead. There should be some small black "pop off" caps. If those are in the centre of the top mount you have rev 2+, if they're offset toward the front of the car then it's rev 1.
Red 92 turbo tintop JDM
White 95 turbo tintop JDM (Nov '11 Show&Shine Winner)
Red 97 NA tintop JDM
Blue 95 tubby tintop JDM
Mica 96 NA T-bar UK
Red 96 UK NA
Red 97 NA tintop JDM

Quick Reply

   
The forum Administrator has chosen to advise you that this topic is 8 years and 11 months old and that you may wish to begin a new topic or use the search feature to find a similar but newer topic.

Return to “MK2”